Friday, February 21, 2014

Revisiting a Lesson: Derivatives of Sine and Cosine

A year ago, I posted the handouts I had made for this lesson. They provide detailed explanations of:
  • how we know sin(x+h) = sin x cos h + cos x sin h
  • the squeeze theorem 
  • how we know (sin x) / x approaches 1 as x approaches 0
  • how we know (cos x - 1) / x approaches 0 as x approaches 0


Thursday Morning Lecture
I love lecturing! I agree that it's not usually an effective way to teach. I keep that in mind when I lecture, and do everything I can to draw my students in. I started out by telling them that as they go on in math it becomes more and more about proof. I warned them it would take a lot of effort to work their way through the reasoning I presented, and asked them to please tell me whenever something wasn't making sense.

I used index cards to call on people, and asked them to provide some of the simpler steps. I asked for the whole class at once to call out the very simplest parts: "sin2 x + cos2 x = ... "  I used different colors of marker to point out various triangles we were considering. I had the students do a few algebra steps individually at their desks before I wrote them on the board. Except for redrawing the diagram and doing those algebra steps, I told them there was no need to take notes, since I would be giving them a handout at the end.

I asked afterwards how many were able to stay with it. I think over half of them raised their hands.

As we worked our way through this diagram, the students were getting a much-needed (for most of them) review of trig.


I need to modify this so that it doesn't look like there's a straight line formed by the terminal sides of α + β  and -β. Darker lines and bigger angle and point identifications would be nice too.

We used this to prove our trig identity, and used that to get as far as...


Next Week
We are through two of the four pages of my handout. For homework, I told them to use their calculators to fill in a table of values, evaluating the two expressions in the limits for  h = .1, .01, .001, etc.  On Monday, we'll look at the squeeze theorem to help us find these two limits, which will finish off our proof. (Maybe I'll give the second handout at the beginning of class, and ask them at the end of class which worked better for them - getting the handout afterward like we did on Thursday, or getting it before.) 

This proof is a good review of trig, a good way to see the power of the squeeze theorem, and a good way to think about limits from some new perspectives. (We have not done a unit on limits. I skip that chapter, and come back to it during our last unit, before considering integration.)



Video?
I was so excited after my 80-minute performance, I wanted to make a video of it. I don't know if it would be useful to anyone else, but a number of my students would have liked to watch it this weekend. A lot of what I do right in my lectures would be hard to reproduce on a video - I need the audience to get me pumped up, and I need to see a confused face to realize that I should say more. But one of my students agreed to be my audience, and another offered to join her. So I might find a way to do my video lesson with just a bit of student participation. If it works out well, maybe I can do a bunch. We'll see...

Just in case, I set up a youtube channel for Math Mama. (Thank goodness that name wasn't taken!)



An Alternate  Proof
When I got home from work, I re-read my blog post from last year. One of the commenters had posted a very different proof for the derivative of sine and cosine. It's very short and very visual. I love it. One of my reactions was to worry that dragging my students through the longer proof was unnecessary.  But I think our work will help the students better understand the sorts of proof that use lots of algebra, and will give them a great context for the squeeze theorem. I also think this alternate proof isn't quite complete. (At some angles, adding a bit to the angle increases the cosine instead of decreasing it. What then?) But it is so cool, I have to show it to my students. I think I'll wait a day or two, so they'll have done all they want with our conventional proof first.


What do you think? Would you use this alternate proof?

Full-time Math Teaching Position at Contra Costa College

The college I work at is hiring. Time got away from me, and I forgot to post this when it first came up. The deadline for applying is next Friday. (Application process is completely online.) If you're interested, check it out. You can email me if you have questions: mathanthologyeditor on gmail.

Wednesday, February 19, 2014

Linkfest for Wednesday, February 19


Tuesday, February 18, 2014

Re-post: My Top Ten Issues in Math Education

Alexandre Borovik invited me to join the writers at The DeMorgan Forum. My first post over there, at his request, is a slightly revised version of My Top Ten Issues in Math Education, originally posted in 2010.


Monday, February 17, 2014

Linkfest for Monday, February 17


Sunday, February 16, 2014

Math Teachers at Play #71 (with 71 links)

Back in 2009, the first time I hosted a Math Teachers at Play Blog Carnival post, we were at #11. Seems like those smaller numbers almost always had something interesting going on. For 71, it's a stretch...

What's Special About This Number has:
  • 71 divides the sum of all the primes before it (i.e., 2 + 3 + 5 + 7 + 11 + ... + 67 is divisible by 71)
  • 71 = (4! + 4.4)/.4 (representation of numbers using only four 4's)
  • 71 = 362 - 352 = 36 + 35
  • 71 - 1 = 1 x 2 x 5 x 7 and 71 + 1 = 3 x 4 x 6 products of partitions of consecutive numbers)
  • 712 = 7! + 1
  • 712 = 27 + 173 (sum of prime powers of two prime numbers)
  • 713 = 357911 (consecutive odd numbers) 

 Number Gossip has:
  • 71 is the only two-digit number n such that (nn-n!)/n is prime.
  • 71 is the 2nd Google number. The nth Google number is the first n-digit prime found in the decimal expansion of e. They are named Google numbers because of the unusual hiring ad that Google put up.
2, 71, 271, 4523, 74713, ...


71, Mark Gonyea
71, Brent Yorgey

And here are a few images of the number 71 itself. Mark Gonyea is a designer. Brent Yorgey and Richard Schwartz are mathematicians. Posters are available for the numbers 1 to 100 from each of these artists.

Richard Schwartz


Math teachers at play know that math is best learned when the student is thoroughly engaged, through their body, their imagination (story-telling), or the world of games. I've started out this month's post with those three categories. (Most of the submissions this month described hands-on, or feet-on, activities. It's as if there had been a theme agreed upon without anyone mentioning it.) Some of the following posts are from submissions, and others are posts that I wanted to share from my internet wanderings. This post has 71 links. (You might need to digest it in smaller bites.) Enjoy!



Learning with Our Bodies

Julie, at Highhill Education, shares her family's mandala art, and the geometry they learned while doing it. (Julie is based in Germany. In the U.S., I've found some of the best inexpensive books come from Dover - here are some of their mandala coloring books.)

Jennifer Bardsley, at Teaching My Baby to Read, works (plays) with her son, exploring rotational symmetry using cookie cutters and flour.

Ticia, at Adventures in Mommydom, shares her hands-on fraction lessons.

Margo Gentile, at Margo's Math and More, was inspired by all those snow days, and created some wonderful mazes in the snow for her dog and kids to navigate. (Bummer! I don't have any snow here in California to try this in.)

Lilac, at Learners in Bloom, wrote Combinatorics in Kindergarten, her story of making clothes for the bears, so her daughters could count how many outfits Little Bear could wear. She also made a Feed the Clown game to help her daughters have fun practicing basic addition facts.

Maria Droujkova, at Moebius Noodles, describes how a student combined ideas from the Moebius Noodles book, making mirror books to create fractal stars.

Nicora, at Bridging the Gap, suggests that we should let students break things to help them learn fractions. "Give them lots and lots of experiences where they have to break up things evenly and share things fairly." Discuss, put back together, discuss some more.

Steven Strogatz describes the math found in our cowlicks and fingerprints.



Storytelling

Denise, at Let's Play Math!, shares the power of stories: "The mere hint of fantasy adventure can change graphing equations from boring to cool." She used  Dan Wekselgreene's inequalities lesson based on the adventures of Ohio Jones. (Denise has written extensively about Fibonacci and Alexandria Jones. I think they must all be related somehow.)

Advertisers tell stories to convince us to buy what they're selling. Often their stories are deceptive. Mr. Honner describes how Prudential's 'oldest person you know' ad subtly points in the wrong direction.

There is a story mathematicians like to tell, of how the young Carl Gauss was asked, along with his classmates, to add up the numbers from 1 to 100, perhaps to give the schoolmaster a bit of time to relax. As the story goes, Carl saw a nice trick, and wrote just the answer down, turning it in almost immediately. Brian Hayes was curious about the historical accuracy of this story, and researched it. His article (in American Scientist) is quite intriguing.

Alexandre Borovik has written a delightful story about Anthony the Ant, and his discoveries of his world (a piece of paper, which gets folded into a cube).



Games & Puzzles

John Golden, at Math Hombre, has a games page that looks marvelous!

Did you know that some coins cost more to make than their face value?! Dan, at Math for Love, used this to make a math lesson, and one of his students came up with a great question. The puzzle she posed is whether or not you can come up with coins that are worth one dollar and cost one dollar to make. And another coins puzzle, from Nathan Kraft, at Out Rockin' Constantly: Which is worth more, a pound of quarters, or a pound of dimes?

I don't know if this counts as a puzzle - more like a problem-solving challenge. Nat Banting, at Musing Mathematically, asks what pattern the wet part of a tire makes as the tire rolls along.

How fast can you decide how many dots you saw? (The creators of this simple game have not left their names. They write: "Subitizing is the ability to immediately recognize the quantity of a small number of objects without counting. Research has shown subitizing to be foundational to basic arithmetic and other math skills. Many children who struggle with basic math also have trouble subitizing.")

Mike, at Spiked Math, has created a very visual puzzle.

Greg Ross, at Futility Closet, has given us the lovely puzzle you see below. You might word it differently, depending on your student's stamina and mathematical sophistication. (Instead of asking for proof, maybe just ask them to find all the midpoints first. Then ask if they can pick points so none of the midpoints will occur at an intersection. Finally, see if they can figure out why five points will always produce at least one line whose midpoint is on an intersection.)




Math Education

Crystal Wagner, at Triumphant Learning, knows that problem solving is at the heart of mathematics, and gives some guidelines and resources for keeping problem-solving at the heart of your math lessons. (I'd like to add two more resources to her list: The Art of Problem Posing, by Stephen Brown, who advocates for students to pose problems, like this. And for advanced math students, The Art and Craft of Problem Solving, by Paul Zeitz.)

Jenny, at Elementary, My Dear, Or Far From It, describes the benefits of confusion.  She also linked to this piece by Jeffrey McClurken, and this piece by Annie Murphy Paul. (It's hard for students in the U.S. to understand how useful confusion is - as a stage in learning anything new. I want to share all their ideas with my college students. Maybe I'll write a post consolidating it all...)

Dan Finkel, at Math for Love, gives an inspiring description (using his goats for comparison) between the fearful learner, who leaves others in charge, and the adventurous learner who takes charge both of their own learning and of the math problem at hand.

Mama Squirrel, at Dewey's Treehouse, wrote How I became a Math Teacher? to describe her journey into math teaching and her thoughts about the matter.

Cathy, at Math Babe, interviews the lead writer of the common core math standards.

Megan Hayes-Golding describes why ranking tasks are especially valuable as learning tools.

Alexandre Borovik, at the De Morgan Forum points to a paper [pdf] by Herbert Wilf, who argues that there is no useful math education research out there. The abstract states:

We examine a number of papers and a book, all of which have been cited, by people who are knowledgeable in the field, as being good examples of “research in mathematics education.” We find specific serious flaws, indeed fatal flaws, in all of them, so that no conclusions of any interest follow as a result of any of the “research” that is reported in these works. We have found no evidence that the research paradigm, involving test and control groups, randomized trials, etc., which is invaluable in the life sciences, is of any use whatever in studying mathematics education and we urge that it be abandoned, in favor of human-to-human discourse about how we can improve curricula and teaching.
Also at the De Morgan Forum are the results of a study that found that practice at "guesstimating" can speed up math ability.  (Hmm, isn't this research on math education? Maybe Wilf has different sorts of research in mind. I'd enjoy discussing his paper with anyone interested.) And another: Can you imagine a whole post on 3 - 1 = 2? Alexandre Borovik has translated a paper originally written in Russian by Igor Arnold, which gives 20 different problems that all boil down to finding 3 - 1.

Bruno Reddy, at Mr. Reddy's Math Blog, posted some interesting videos from a workshop he attended. If you teach students with limited English language proficiency, you may find this valuable.

Geoff Krall, at Emergent Math, is thinking about how to make his classroom a safe place for taking risks. That's a common theme at Cheesemonkey's blog.



Visual Math

Dan Walsh, at Dan's Geometrical Curiosities, saw this, and just had to figure it out. The mathematical description of what's happening is called curves of pursuit.

Here's your chance to make a bit of mathematical art: at weavesilk.com. Ahh...

If you were going to try to figure out how far it is to the horizon, what sort of picture would you draw? Bryan Meyer, at Doing Mathematics, thinks we can learn a lot about students' thinking by discussing the pictures they draw to solve problems with.

The two mathematicians described at the beginning of this post, Brent Yorgey and Richard Schwartz, have made their images to help people visualize factors, prime numbers, and composite numbers. Jeffrey Ventrella has the same goal with his composite number tree and his book, Divisor Drips and Square Root Waves (link is to a fascinating online version). There is also this intriguing Prime Number Patterns applet, by Jason Davies.



News

A simulation of glacier movement can be run backwards to predict where things were in the past. When the remains of some hikers who were lost almost 90 years ago were recently found, the simulation was used to figure out where they most likely were when they died.

Rachel Thomas, at +plus magazine, writes about the math of bubbles, which inspired the architecture of the National Aquatic Centre in Beijing, built for the Olympics.

The Rubik's cube has over 43 quintillion (4.3x1019) positions. It has recently been shown that there is a way to move it to each different position in sequence, without ever repeating a position. (This is called a Hamiltonian circuit.) Thanks to Robert Talbert for pointing this out on his Casting out Nines blog.

Caroline Chen has written a very readable account of the strange proof of the ABC Conjecture.

The Journal of Humanistic Mathematics has some interesting articles in its current issue, including one on Gallileo and Aristotles' Wheel [pdf] describing a paradox and how mathematicians think about it.

Joselle Kehoe, at Mathematics Rising, writes about brain research showing that the part of the brain that deals with counting deals also (and earlier in our evolution) with representing the fingers.

(from Pat Bellew)


Valentine's Day Math

Mr. Honner wishes us all a Happy Permutation Day.

Laura, at Math for Grownups, shared this quickie video (she calls if a gif, my son calls these vines) valentine.



A Few More Tidbits

Video Helpers for Algorithms and Problem-Solving (from Prairie Creek Community School)



Recursion (links to other collections of math links)

Brie Finegold, at Blog on Math Blogs, has ideas about how to get your friend to like math.

Math Munch comes out weekly. Anna Weltman, Justin Lanier, and Paul Salomon say: "We write Math Munch to help more kids find something mathematical that they love." Here's a post I liked on art and math, one of their favorite topics, I think. And this post is full of puzzles.
Don’t miss the 107th Carnival of Mathematics (our sister blog carnival).




That rounds up this edition of the Math Teachers at Play carnival. I hope you enjoyed the ride.
The next installment of our carnival will open sometime during the second week of March. If you would like to contribute, please use this handy submission form. Posts must be relevant to students or teachers of preK-12 mathematics. Old posts are welcome, as long as they haven’t been published in past editions of this carnival.

Past posts and future hosts can be found on our blog carnival information page. We need more volunteers. Classroom teachers, homeschoolers, unschoolers, or anyone who likes to play around with math (even if the only person you “teach” is yourself) — if you would like to take a turn hosting the Math Teachers at Play blog carnival, please speak up!

Saturday, January 25, 2014

Potpourri: Links and a French Curve Question

Links
Here's the one I most want to share with everyone, but now I have some reservations...
A lovely documentary on mathematical origami, called Between the Folds, has been posted to youtube. The DVD costs $20, which seems quite reasonable to me. This youtube posting is not from the producers, Green Fuse Films. I've contacted them, in case they want to have it removed. Watch it quickly if you'd like to. The official trailer is also on youtube, so you can get a taste, even after the pirate version is gone.



Many of the links I'm saving these days are ideas I hope to share with my students:

Calculus I
Intuiting the Chain Rule (Girls' Angle)

Calculus II
Volume of a Pendant (SquareCircleZ)

Linear Algebra
What's so special about the 4 fundamental subspaces? (math.stackexchange)



Some of the links aren't for a course, but for me to try out, some day when I have time...

Geometry
Circles and Equilateral Triangles (Pat's Blog)







Question
A student came to me last week for help. He wants to use fabric (a very loose weave, which will stretch some) to cover a sphere. He needed to know what shape to cut. I had no idea, and first suggested he look at information on world maps. He wants nice seams and no puckering. I thought a shape that wrapped around the equator, with sort of triangular tabs up and down to the poles might work. We knew the sides of those needed to curve, and he wanted an equation. I thought he should experiment with 8 tabs in each direction at first, and those would need to have a 45 degree angle at the pole. I had no idea what kind of equation would fit this.

A former student, who designs and sews clothing, was in the math lab, and I brought him into our conversation. He said he would use a French curve, which is what you see in the image above. We looked it up, and no one seems to know the equations for the curves.

So my question is about the French curves. Can anyone help me figure out their equations?

The coolest thing happened as I began to write this post. I was trying to sketch my pattern idea freehand, and I'm a terrible drawer. So I turned to Geogebra, and started putting in the points and lines. When I got to the curved segments, I was in the right frame of mind. I knew I needed something between the points (0,.5) and (1,3.5), with a vertical tangent at (0,.5) and a slope of 1 (same as 45 degrees) at (1,3.5). I knew that the square root function starts out with a vertical tangent, and so I figured I'd try to modify that. Getting it to go though those two points, I was having trouble getting the slope at the top right. (I think there's a way...) So I figured I could change what root I used. And I solved the problem I had posed! (Always a rush.) The first curve is y = 3 times the cube root of x. The next one in the same direction is y = 3 times the cube root of (x-2), and the one between, that goes in the other direction, is y = 3 times the cube root of (2-x). They may not be just the right shape. My student will have to experiment at this point, I think.

Or is there a way to figure out a better shape mathematically? The problem is that we are really just approximating, because the fabric is a flat surface, and the sphere is everywhere curved (in all directions). So I don't see how we can
 describe perfectly what we want. Ideas?

[Oops! I just tried to explain this to my son, and realized those points have two 45 degree angles in them, for a total of 90 degrees. Back to the drawing board! (More to come...)]

Sunday, January 12, 2014

Calculus: Solids of Revolution

In about a week, I'll be working with my students on solids of revolution. (At least, I hope to be. My calc II class is too small right now, and could be canceled.) Patrick Honner's Math Photo post of three beautiful bottles exemplifying solids of revolutions inspired me. I looked up beautiful bottles on Google Images, and there are so many. Some of them are solids of revolution and some aren't. I wonder if my students would benefit by identifying which are which.

Maybe that could be a first step, and then drawing a curve they think would make a good-looking volume when revolved. Hmm... (Anyone know a super-easy 3D modeler we good put our curves in, and get visuals from?)

Maybe this Friday I can get some students to come in and work with me on making models of volumes (not volumes of revolution, though), like these that Bowman Dickson made, or these (both types) that Rebecka Peterson made.


Saturday, January 11, 2014

Wolfram Alpha Glitch!

There are many great math calculation resources online. Wolfram Alpha is probably the most well-known. I've used it often from home, where I don't have a calculator. I used to create graphs there that I could copy onto my handouts and tests, but now I use Desmos for that.

Wolfram has lots of interesting features, but it must be hard to make sure everything works just right. There is a statistical procedure to find the line or curve of best fit given a number of data points. If the data points are exactly on a line or curve, you'd think it would be especially easy. But somehow it isn't.







I was asking Wolfram to give me an equation like y=ax2+bx+c, which would go as near as possible to the points (0,0), (1,1), (2,4). The right answer is y=x2, but Wolfram gives an answer with teeny tiny x and constant terms added in.

A quick Google search doesn't turn up any information on why this happens. I learned about it from David Cushing on Aperiodical. It turns out that if you ask for a parabola instead of a quadratic, you get the right answer. The wrong answer happens because the computer is using a complex procedure which produces numbers that can only be represented approximately on the computer, and some very small round-off errors show up at the end.


Friday, January 10, 2014

Explaining Calculus using the Up-Goer Five Text Editor

Randall Munroe writes xkcd, a series of comic strips that often involve math, technology, and science. (Sometimes not safe for work, or kids.) A few years back, he wrote a description of the Saturn Five, which he called the Up-Goer Five, using only the one thousand most commonly used words. Theo Sanderson was intrigued, and built a text editor that only allows those words. He called it 'The Up-Goer Five Text Editor.'

A friend linked to this on Facebook, asking: "Can you explain a hard idea using the ten hundred most common words?" So I decided to try to explain calculus. What I wrote seems pretty bad. My explanation from October seems much clearer. But I thought I'd share.

Will you try it with a math topic? (I'd love to see a better description of calculus.) Here are some of the words you can't use: math, slope, steepness, circle, curve, and infinity.


About calculus:Some lines are straight. Some are not. It's easy to think about how much a straight line goes up as it goes over. It's harder to think about that when the line is not straight. Two guys figured out some good ideas to help think about this around 1670. They cared because it would help people think about the world. How fast do things fall? How does light turn when it goes through round glass? How do we find the best way to do something? Their ideas also help us think about areas that don't have straight edges.

To think about these things, we need to think about something bigger than any number, about  two things closer than any number can say, and about cutting smaller parts than any number can say. Thinking about this in just right ways takes some hard thinking.
 
Math Blog Directory